A useful TON discovery plan starts with the right destination
A good plan separates listing submissions from promotional placements, then chooses relevant destinations for your project. We start by looking at what people can already see. We also check what your team wants to make easier to find.
The options below describe the work in plain terms. We agree on destinations and materials before anything is submitted. That way, your team knows what each activity is meant to do.
| Work | What we prepare or coordinate | What we record |
|---|---|---|
| Ecosystem directory or wallet listing | Project details, links, and requested assets | Submission status and any visible update |
| Discovery platform information | A consistent project description and official links | Destination and follow-up status |
| Promotional placement | Approved materials for an agreed channel | Placement status and available evidence |
A project may need one type of support or a mix. For example, a team with accurate directory details may focus next on an agreed placement. A project with several different public descriptions may first need one approved reference set. Our listings and verification work can help teams compare wider listing needs. We consider other crypto tracker listings as a separate destination group.
Make room for a clear project story before attention arrives
Clear project information makes listing and promotion work easier to follow. We help you check the public details first. This way, material shared across destinations reflects the version your team has approved.
Picture a night-shift community moderator as a roadmap update is about to go out. They spot an old project description in a public directory and a newer one in the community channel. We would help gather the approved wording and links before preparing any submissions.
That small check can save a team from answering the same clarification in several places. It also gives your moderator a reliable reference. They can use it when community members ask where to find current project information. At Brand Community, we keep the review practical. We flag differences, ask your team to confirm the right version, and use approved details in the agreed work.
If the project is building an ongoing conversation with users, community growth and engagement can sit alongside listing activity. It serves a different purpose. It helps your team support the community after people arrive. You can decide whether that belongs in the same plan or should remain a separate piece of work.
What should a TON project have ready before submission?
A TON project should have one approved set of names, descriptions, links, and assets before we prepare submissions. That gives everyone a shared version to check. It also reduces avoidable back-and-forth.
The details we check
We review current public listings against the information your team provides. The 3-part check is simple: project identity, official destinations, and relevant network or token details. Your team confirms the final wording and verifies that each link is official.
Imagine a mini-app team preparing a new public description. Its website still uses older wording. We would note the mismatch and ask which version is approved. We would hold the submission materials until that point is clear. The team can then review the same details before they are sent elsewhere.
How to choose destinations
We discuss which directories, wallets, discovery platforms, and approved channels fit the project’s aim. A useful destination should have a clear reason for inclusion. It should also have suitable project information and a way to check the status afterward. For related tracker work, our CoinMarketCap listing support and CoinGecko listing support are separate workstreams. Each has its own requirements.
Before kickoff, gather the approved project name and summary, official website and social links, and current logo. Include a contact who can answer follow-up questions. Confirm network or token details where they apply.
From the first public check to a useful closing note
The work moves from a review of current visibility to approved submissions, placement coordination, and status reporting. We keep your team informed at each handoff. That includes updates when an external response is still pending.
- Share the project details. Send the official website, channels, current listing links, and approved description. Include a contact for questions.
- Review what is already visible. We check public information and note gaps, inconsistencies, and relevant destinations.
- Approve the plan and materials. We agree on destinations, promotional placements, responsibilities, and what updates will show.
- Coordinate the agreed work. We prepare and submit approved information. Then we coordinate placements included in the plan.
- Check status and wrap up. We share periodic updates and a closing summary. This separates completed work from a submission awaiting a reply, with available links or evidence where appropriate.
The first checkpoint is the information review. The next is your approval of destinations and materials. Reporting then follows the campaign period we agree. Preparation can begin once required details are ready. You’ll see completed work clearly separated from a submission awaiting a reply. Our how we work page offers more detail on how we keep coordination clear.
Keep listing work in step with your wider TON launch
TON listing and promotion work fits best when project descriptions, official links, and launch materials tell the same story. A single approved reference set helps your team keep those details aligned. It works across public destinations and community channels.
You may want to pair this work with creator activity, but the two have different jobs. A listing helps keep project information available in relevant discovery spaces. A creator campaign brings its own content and coordination needs. If that second channel matters, KOL and creator campaigns can be considered alongside the listing plan. Teams preparing exchange outreach can review centralized exchange listing support as a separate service.
Platform operators set their own editorial choices, listing requirements, and approval or placement outcomes. Search and AI answer systems also choose independently what they display. We can’t promise that a destination will accept a submission or show it in a particular position. We can report the agreed work and observable status.
For a first review, send us your website, official channels, and existing listing links. Add a short note about who you hope to reach. We’ll check what’s already public and identify the materials and destinations to discuss next.
How it works
- Share your project detailsSend your official website, channels, current listing links, and approved description. Include a contact who can confirm details and answer follow-up questions.
- Review public informationWe check what is visible now. Then we note gaps, inconsistencies, and possible destinations for the plan.
- Approve the planWe prepare the submission information and agree on destinations, placements, responsibilities, and reporting before work proceeds.
- Coordinate submissions and placementsWe submit approved materials and coordinate the promotional placements included in the agreed plan.
- Receive status updatesWe share periodic updates and a closing summary. It distinguishes completed work from pending responses.
Frequently asked questions
What should I send for a first TON visibility review?
Send your official website, social channels, current listing links, and approved project description. Include current logo files and confirmed network or token details when relevant. A team contact who can approve wording helps us keep the review moving. We compare these details with what is publicly visible and note what needs attention.
Can this work cover a Telegram mini-app?
We can review a mini-app’s public information and discuss which relevant ecosystem destinations fit the project. For example, we would look at the app description, official links, and current public listings before agreeing on submissions. We confirm the destinations and work together before anything is prepared or sent.
How is a listing submission different from a placement?
A listing submission shares project information with a relevant directory, wallet, or discovery platform. A promotional placement is coordinated through an agreed channel using materials your team approves. We record them separately. That way, a submitted listing is not described as a placement that has run.
How long should we allow for the campaign?
We agree on the campaign period after reviewing your materials and priorities. Preparation starts once your team has approved the required details. We share status updates during the agreed period. For example, a missing logo or unclear project description may need sorting before submissions can be prepared.
Can you promise approval or a particular TON listing position?
No. Platform operators make their own editorial decisions and set listing requirements. Search and AI answer systems independently choose what to display. We can agree on the submissions, coordination, and reporting we will handle. Then we show the status we can observe.
How will I know whether a promotional placement went live?
We record the agreed destination and materials. Then we include available links or other evidence in status updates. The report distinguishes a visible placement from activity that is still awaiting confirmation. Your team can use that record to check what happened without confusing a submitted request with a completed placement.
Tell us about your project
Answer four quick questions and a manager will send you a plan, timing and a price range within the hour. Everything stays confidential.
Loading the form…