A steadier route to listings on other crypto trackers

How do we move from a tracker shortlist to a submission?

We first agree which trackers fit your project. Then we prepare and check each submission in a clear sequence.

1. Choose possible destinations. We discuss the audiences and profile types you have in mind, including CoinPaprika, CoinCodex, CoinCarp and LiveCoinWatch.
2. Check the public record. We compare your website, documentation and existing profiles for mismatched names, links or token details.
3. Gather the approved facts. You name one person who can confirm descriptions, links and any token information.
4. Prepare each request. We organize the facts and assets for the visible fields and instructions of each selected tracker.
5. Record what happened. We note submission status, follow-up questions and profile links when pages become visible.

This 5-step route keeps decisions easy to follow. A tracker shortlist is not just a longer list of sites. It should match your project and the information you can support. If you are weighing other kinds of platform presence, our listings and verification overview shows how those tasks can sit alongside tracker work. A CoinMarketCap listing is a separate platform-specific request, not an automatic part of this service.

Give the quiet launch a useful record

A tidy project record helps us prepare consistent submissions and gives your team something useful to return to later.

Picture a founder whose first launch was quiet. The campaign has ended, and nobody wrote down what happened. We would start by collecting what is already public. Then we’d ask the founder to approve one reliable set of project facts before preparing tracker requests. The point is not to dress up the story. It is to make the project easy to describe accurately.

For example, suppose your website uses a newer project name than an older tracker profile. We would flag the difference and ask which name and source should guide the new submission. If token information needs a closer check, circulating supply verification may be a useful companion task.

Before we begin, gather your official project name, website, a short description, documentation, public social links and logo files. For a token project, include its chain, contract details and explorer page. We can use one approved fact sheet as the starting point, then adapt it to each tracker’s visible request fields.

The work, from first review to profile check

You get organized submissions and a clear record of what is visible, what is pending and what needs your input. The timing of each part follows your materials and the selected trackers’ processes.

We keep the record simple: tracker name, submission status, profile link where available, and any next action. We record what was sent, so your team can refer back to those details. That avoids rebuilding the story in a long email thread. If a visible token profile needs a correction rather than a new request, our explorer token information update service may fit that task. The tracker work itself stays focused on the platforms and checks we agree together.

What happens after a tracker receives your details?

After submission, we can keep the information organized and help answer questions using facts your team approves.

We check the status we can see, pass along requests for clarification and help prepare a clear response from your source material. We also keep a record of what was sent. Your team can refer back to those details instead of rebuilding the story in a long email thread. A single project contact makes this easier: they can confirm facts and gather answers from other team members.

Each tracker makes its own eligibility and review decisions, chooses its profile format and controls when information appears. We cannot promise acceptance or a particular profile position; we can promise the preparation, coordination and visible-page checks agreed for the work. Once a profile is live, we compare its visible details with the version you approved. We flag differences for your decision.

If your project has changed its name or contract, a fresh submission may not be the right first task. Our migration and rebranding update support can help organize changes to existing public records.

Keep the project record useful after publication

A useful handoff leaves your team with a record it can maintain, not just a set of sent requests.

We group the closing notes by tracker and make any remaining action easy to spot. That might be an unanswered question, a profile detail that needs your review, or a page link to keep with your project records. If CoinGecko or CryptoRank also matters to your audience, we can consider those as separate tasks through CoinGecko listing support or CryptoRank listing support.

• Keep one approved source for project names, descriptions and public links.
• Save the profile URL and status for each tracker in one place.
• Tell us when a contract, chain or project description changes.

At Brand Community, we make the handoff practical: you receive the submitted facts, visible profile links and any open follow-up in a concise note. Send us your website, current tracker links, token details if relevant, and the names of trackers you want considered. We’ll review what is ready, flag gaps and agree the next steps with you.

How it works

1. Share the project recordSend your website, documentation, current tracker links and token details if relevant. Choose one person to approve factual information.
2. Agree the tracker shortlistWe review project fit and the visible submission routes, then confirm which trackers and tasks to include.
3. Prepare and coordinate requestsWe organize the approved facts and assets for each tracker. We bring questions back to your contact for confirmation.
4. Check the visible profilesWe compare published details with the approved record and share profile links, status and any remaining follow-up.